A bank extends payments and FX into a new market
Payments and FX into a new market on one integration, with a release record the bank’s own audit can read.
The chain, in order.
Every call below exists and is documented. Take any line to the reference and check it. That is the point of publishing a scenario rather than a testimonial.
- Fund and instructA funding account and a saved settlement instruction, set up once.
- QuotePOST /v1/fx/quote, or read the current rate.
- Place the orderPOST /v1/fx/orders. It does not execute yet.
- A second person releases itPOST /v1/fx/orders/{order_id}/approve, by a different user.
- SettleProceeds to an account, a wallet or the saved instruction.
- EvidenceThe order reads back with its rate, its approver and its settlement.
What it assembles.
Banks · European Union, Latin America. Three product lines, one customer record, one integration.
Product lines
- FX and Trade Desk
- Payments and payouts
- Accounts
What this is, and what it is not.
Worth stating twice on a page like this, because the convention in this category is to imply the opposite.
This is an illustrative scenario, not a customer story.
No company is named because none has approved being named, and no outcome figure appears because none has been confirmed. What is real is the chain: every endpoint above is documented, and they are in the order an integration would call them.
When a customer approves a named story with a figure behind it, it will replace one of these and it will say so.
The other scenarios.
One per segment. Each one is a different set of lines against the same platform.